This is the best thing I saw today:
If you can’t make it out, that’s material knitted to resemble my favorite thing–a pigeon! I like that it’s a fake pigeon pecking what appears to be a real plant. This is exactly the kind of window display I would put together if that were my trade.
Here’s the first image that comes up when you do a Google search of “worst window displays”:
I was expecting something worse than that, to be honest. There’s nothing all that shocking about it. Though the mannequin on the right looks a lot like a Canadian man I once knew.
Here’s “bad window displays”:
I appreciate that the smallest mannequin’s eyes are being covered. I hate when tender-aged mannequins are exposed to explicit sexual acts.
That reminds me of a newspaper article from today’s New York Times about the new MTV series “Skins.” There have been ads ALL OVER the subways the past couple weeks. I didn’t catch the premiere Monday night, but I suspected that the show involved teenagers doing drugs and having sex. And the article confirmed that and then some, saying, “In recent days, executives at the cable channel became concerned that some scenes from the provocative new show ‘Skins’ may violate federal child pornography statutes.” That’s because all of the actors MTV gathered are under 18, the youngest being 15, and they’re filming scenes featuring “simulated masturbation, implied sexual assault, and teenagers disrobing and getting into bed together.”
I don’t care if it is a realistic portrait of life for modern day teenagers. It still upsets me. It mainly upsets me because I was not this breed of teenager. I was not wild and adventurous, trying new substances and boys at every turn. I was naive and confused and awkward. The kids in these ads plastering the subways are sexy and confident and know how to apply makeup so well. Is this realistic? Or is this just the reality that MTV wants to sell and attract impressionable viewers with?